|
Nuttyrob Sage 
Platon
Level 74
Ranger
|
13th September 2011 16:11:46
firius, i would have to agree with you on the unbalancing of warriors vs rangers. the other day i fought a lvl 25 warrior with 30.30 skills and while i was doing 0-50 dmg to him he was consistently hitting me for 120s. im not saying that rangers should be doing just as much to warriors as warriors do to rangers but i think a good way to balance it is make it so rangers attacks have armor penetration or defending penetration.
|
|
Bullzeye Player 
Pharos
Level 65
Ranger
|
13th September 2011 16:13:35
Nuttyrob i glad that you agree with me :D
|
|
Meu Charzinho Player 
Platon
Level 81
Warrior
|
13th September 2011 16:17:18 Quoting Nuttyrob: firius, i would have to agree with you on the unbalancing of warriors vs rangers. the other day i fought a lvl 25 warrior with 30.30 skills and while i was doing 0-50 dmg to him he was consistently hitting me for 120s. im not saying that rangers should be doing just as much to warriors as warriors do to rangers but i think a good way to balance it is make it so rangers attacks have armor penetration or defending penetration. I agree that warriors should have less physical defense on PVP :s They are god-like if they've got the right gears and skills, due to the low dmg taken + high health and high heal :l |
|
Bullzeye Player
Pharos
Level 65
Ranger
|
13th September 2011 16:18:05 (Last edited 13th September 2011 16:19:59)
Thanks my friends, i hope gms understand :D
This theard can keep rolling with agree and disagree but the point is that gm understand what i mean :) |
|
Grunt Holgan Player 
Tipitaka
Level 47
Mage
|
13th September 2011 16:48:01 (Last edited 13th September 2011 16:50:07)
Mage beats warrior
warrior beats ranger ranger beats mage That's all. Mages have high damage (only when doing combos), but they are also easy to be killed. In theory mages are strong and weak at the same time. Warriors make a little bit more dmg on a mage than the rangers. (so it's ok) Warriors... they are supposed to be something like a tank. I have never seen a warrior of lvl 47 owned by solo style by a mage lvl 47, or... yes? Shamans lvl 47 can kill warriors of lvl 47 by solo style from full combo. ( a little bit unbalanced the subclass of shamans) Rangers are like warriors that use distance weapons. It is normal to see a warrior making more damage on a ranger than on another warrior. Rangers are difficult to catch because they can be played easily, so it's normal to deal more damage on rangers if you are warrior. *Make more defending on ranger, then increase the damage that is being done by a ranger, and you'll get a full game of rangers. I think that rangers are a balanced class. We need better buff for some mage subclasses, that's all. *Why mages aren't supposed to train their magic lvl fast? *Why rangers and warriors are supposed to train their distance and defending faster? While someone takes any vocation he must accept the advantages and disadvantages of his vocation. Ask Solid Ninja if he thinks that a warrior is unbalanced. |
|
Baltas Player 
Pharos
Level 362
Mage
|
13th September 2011 20:59:18
When rangers will get extra distances from new skill formula, they wont hit more on warriors, cause warriors will get defending skills, but mage will be screwed by rangers.
|
|
Oxonium Player 
Platon
Level 50
Mage
|
13th September 2011 21:07:29 Quoting Baltas: When rangers will get extra distances from new skill formula, they wont hit more on warriors, cause warriors will get defending skills, but mage will be screwed by rangers. Same goes for rangers ;] u mad, bro? |
|
Grunt Holgan Player
Tipitaka
Level 47
Mage
|
13th September 2011 21:11:22 Quoting Baltas: When rangers will get extra distances from new skill formula, they wont hit more on warriors, cause warriors will get defending skills, but mage will be screwed by rangers. I agree with you. |
|
Bullzeye Player
Pharos
Level 65
Ranger
|
14th September 2011 15:37:24 (Last edited 14th September 2011 15:38:54) Quoting Baltas: When rangers will get extra distances from new skill formula, they wont hit more on warriors, cause warriors will get defending skills, but mage will be screwed by rangers. My friend i dont think rangers screw mages, because you got spells like buff which reduce the damage. But the problem is warrior screw already ranger too much, because very high defence so i hope they do something. And until ranger can get good skills you can get lvl 50+! with mage |
|
Baltas Player
Pharos
Level 362
Mage
|
2nd September 2014 16:21:32 Quoting Bullzeye: Hello, I have seen few players like Isopet, Rama and Rebecca Black i hope its okay i take you guys like example :D Isopet lvl 90 mage with a wand which damage 110+, you will say because he is high level, if he gave it to a low level the damage of the low will 80-100 and the combo and buff on all subclass on mages damage very very much. Is mage overpowerd? Yes Rebecca Black nice name btw, is a warrior 30+ which 31 skills but with equipment like a tank, which is not fair to rangers like Rama(Which is good on war) he/she will damage less (Damage: 0-50) or they he will miss. When she come close she damage him 100+. Rama Ranger lvl 50+ can kill mage? Yes (but it will take long time) if the mage have subclass lvl 30 that is impossible to kill then, you wonder why? Mage buff make ranger or warrior take less damage and when the shoot combo they can kill the ranger and warrior. Rama can kill warriors like rebecca black? not possible he have much less damage on her, so its not possible. Rebecca can kill Rama, yes if rama out of potions, Then what is rebecca a warlord with tank equipment that can kill many ranger with low skills. Only mage can kill all :/ I hope gms you understand me and make it balanced :/ If a warrior runs out of pots another warrior can kill him as well :/ |