Hello,

I have seen few players like Isopet, Rama and Rebecca Black i hope its okay i take you guys like example :D

Isopet lvl 90 mage with a wand which damage 110+, you will say because he is high level, if he gave it to a low level the damage of the low will 80-100 and the combo and buff on all subclass on mages damage very very much. Is mage overpowerd? Yes

Rebecca Black nice name btw, is a warrior 30+ which 31 skills but with equipment like a tank, which is not fair to rangers like Rama(Which is good on war) he/she will damage less (Damage: 0-50) or they he will miss. When she come close she damage him 100+.

Rama Ranger lvl 50+ can kill mage? Yes (but it will take long time) if the mage have subclass lvl 30 that is impossible to kill then, you wonder why? Mage buff make ranger or warrior take less damage and when the shoot combo they can kill the ranger and warrior.

Rama can kill warriors like rebecca black? not possible he have much less damage on her, so its not possible. Rebecca can kill Rama, yes if rama out of potions, Then what is rebecca a warlord with tank equipment that can kill many ranger with low skills. Only mage can kill all :/

I hope gms you understand me and make it balanced :/

Makes no sense to me. What was the point of this thread?

You can see what i write last sentence: I hope gms you understand me and make it balanced :/

Well, its ok all u are saying but by my point of view mages have been created to kill and warriors/rangers to not be killed. That's all.

If u want to kill, make a mage, if u dont want to be killed, then make a warrior or ranger.

The point is not only mage, warrior is the same vs ranger a ranger should make 30-70damage not 0-50 damage on warrior

I like the way it is. I can deal dmg to same lvl/skilled warrior from distance all the time (tho I hit few) and warrior can hit me only when he catch me. I can keep attacking mage, so he can't really do much meanwhile, without using a lot of health pots (and bigger mana pots kinda needed too).
Imo it should go like this:
Mage beats warrior
warrior beats ranger
ranger beats mage

And that's the way it is already imo. Tho, there's small unbalances. Like either ranger has little too low attack, or warrior got too high def. And mage got little too easy get magic lvl compared to warriors/rangers to get skills. Tho, it already get fixed by new skill formula after update, right?

I agree with you Rama but the new skill formula is only for get faster skill not damage i think :/

If i understod right by the gms and players :P

about this:
Mage beats warrior
warrior beats ranger
ranger beats mage

its right but ranger should get the possiblity to kill warrior if you have good war skills like you and same for mage :D

You know... Only possible fight which can lead to death in 1vs1 is mage vs mage. No matter how good you are in pvp. You can't deal enough damage to same lvl/skilled guy solo. Only way to kill them is that other guy is lagging or just lacking.

I hope i get other opinions btw gm please replay :/

Its all about the early levels. If you get the higher leveled people it'll be totally different
If you get a level 100 skill 65 ranger, a level 100 skill 65 warrior and a level 100 magic level 65 mage.
The warrior won't die by any of them, but won't kill anyone too.
The mage will be raped by the ranger, but won't die or kill him too, same goes if he fight with the warrior.
And the ranger won't in any case die for this mage, neither by the warrior.
= happy balance.
Of course the field helps a lot on that and the number too but always on a 2v1 the alone person will die, unless it is 2 rangers vs. 1 warrior.
Some of you might think this post of mine is useless, but my point here is that what only need to be balanced are the earlier levels.

also about PvE I can just add that warrior sucks at the beginning ('cause its needed too many time for training) and mages are lightspeed - but in the end the warriors will be superior to the mages.