I'd like some points clarified here.

We had several announcements this season that, in the end, did not meet expectations.

First of all, Ironborn was supposed to have access to ALL PREMIUM items in a way that allowed trading, buying, and so on. I reported this issue throughout practically the entire season, yet it was never corrected.

Secondly, the SEASONAL server was supposed to allow character transfers to the destination server chosen by the player, according to the standards stated in the official announcement.

I understand that the server became successful and that there is interest in keeping it as an official server. However, character transfers should still be allowed, including transfers to AEGIS, since seasonal players often seek pets and outfits for collections and/or trading on the servers they actively play on.

So what should be done is, who wants to transfer is open for a period of time in the end of the season, then the server starts as a normal server.

Ye its basically 3 non pvp servers now.
Like moses they just split the PVP community in to two different servers

Instead of all this beating around the bush, it would have been better to announce from the beginning that it would be permanent; now to have this weirdness... it would have been better to do the following: a European server and a South American server, since that's what they were going to do.

The problem was they didn’t know that Aegis would bring such success and that many where interested in continue playing if it closed . The right thing was to extend 3 weeks but unfortunately since a lot of Pharos players cried and spoofed votes the staff had no choice but to choose this route .

Big success, 20 players online. ON FIRE

Well, your success wasn't 80 players, that's what we saw when you started the voting.

And you're still here complaining? Go play Minecraft, dude. You're such a drag. Stop complaining and play, or don't play at all, that's it. God

Neither was yours, 135 people but our "legit" users where over 1/2 of the votes, your legit players wasn't even 1/10.

All you guys do is cry victim 24/7 surely that must get tiring just feeling like the world owes you something all the time.
You cry about ping heres our from the EU too:

You cry cause you couldn't transfer so they let you transfer.
You cry about spawns but you had a mapper on your team......

Like archers said in discord "We have no reason to play, my friend. We're level 1000+, and we haven't had any new content in over a year."
Cause he "cannot" play he doesn't want others too either.

Where are the 85 active Aegis players? YOU said there were at least 40 “LEGIT USERS,” and Aegis barely goes over 20 whenever I check the website. Tonight it dropped to 7, and right now there are 12.

As for complaining, this is one of the few chances for something to reach the OWNER’s ears, and people aren’t wrong to complain. A seasonal server held a vote to decide whether there would be a transfer cap or not. On Elysium, people voted to have only a 50% EXP reduction on transfer, and that wasn’t followed. It seems common sense only works one way. The vote to have no transfer cap from Aegis to Pharos won, and that vote you considered legitimate. When you win, it’s legitimate; when the other side wins, it’s cheating.

Well, I don’t even need to mention the arbitrary change made on the BaiaK server, and then with only four days left a vote appears to extend it. If that isn’t acting in a biased way, then I don’t know what is. On top of that, several players are using banana emojis with racist intent with no moderation at all on Discord. That pushes away even more neutral Brazilian players and beginners from the game. I’ll leave a screenshot of one of those players so we don’t forget.

For those who don’t know, “if I play, I play to win.” is Gilbert Araque, the same person who stole several accounts on Elysium and is now “freelancing” on someone’s Aegis account. Is he going to steal this one too?

About the lack of content, it’s clear that when this mapper was working and the game released at least one hardcore hunt per month, the number of active players increased a lot. Pharos almost hit 30 and Elysium almost 50 at peak times. When new hunts stopped being released, it slowly dropped back to the usual numbers. Maybe using some kind of AI support, if it’s not too expensive, could help with that. I’m not knowledgeable in this area, so I’ll just leave the idea here in case someone with more experience wants to add to it.

Anyway, this discussion won’t lead anywhere. It’s probably too late now, but if the staff had followed the Tibia model, it wouldn’t have caused so many problems. It’s a model similar to what most people are used to in other similar games.